Five Repair Conversations Every Leader Should Know How to Have

Most leaders can navigate strategy, performance, and planning with ease. But when trust breaks, words often fail. The conversations that matter most—the ones that rebuild relationships after rupture—are the ones we’re least prepared to have.

Repair is not instinctive. It’s a learned skill, and one that determines whether teams evolve through conflict or quietly erode under it.

At The Human Repair Workshop, we’ve trained hundreds of organizations in the practice of repair. Across industries, sectors, and hierarchies, the same truth appears: leaders who know how to speak accountability into words sustain trust longer and recover faster.

These are five scripts they rely on most often—not as talking points, but as scaffolding for honest dialogue.


1. When a Mistake Needs Repair

Purpose: To acknowledge harm and take responsibility without defensiveness.

“I want to revisit what happened [specific situation]. I [specific action]. I see now that [impact]. That wasn’t okay, regardless of intent. Going forward, [specific commitment]. What else would be helpful for you to know about how I’m approaching this?”

This structure works because it separates impact from intent, keeps the focus on accountability, and ends with an invitation rather than a performance of apology.

Avoid: “I’m sorry if you felt…” or “That wasn’t my intent.” Both recenter the speaker and undo the repair before it begins.


2. When a Meeting Went Sideways

Purpose: To name tension early, before it calcifies into resentment.

“During [meeting or situation], I noticed [specific behavior or energy shift]. I wanted to check in, because it seemed like something shifted. Can you tell me what that moment was like for you?”

Followed by genuine listening, this approach communicates curiosity, not accusation. It normalizes reflection after difficult moments and keeps minor ruptures from becoming structural ones.


3. When Feedback Travels Indirectly

Purpose: To take responsibility when harm is surfaced through others.

“I heard that [specific action or comment] had an impact I didn’t realize in the moment. I care about understanding it directly from you. Here’s what I know so far—what am I missing?”

Leaders often encounter feedback secondhand. Responding with transparency rather than avoidance signals psychological safety: the willingness to hear hard truths without retaliation or defensiveness.


4. When a Decision Didn’t Land Well

Purpose: To address organizational rupture after a leadership decision.

“I want to acknowledge that the recent [decision/change/policy] has created frustration and confusion. We moved faster than we should have, and the process wasn’t as transparent as it needed to be. Here’s what we’re adjusting going forward…”

Repair at the organizational level isn’t about reversing the decision—it’s about restoring clarity. Process transparency builds more trust than perfect outcomes ever will.


5. When the Relationship Itself Needs Repair

Purpose: To name ongoing tension and invite redesign.

“It feels like our collaboration has shifted. I’ve noticed [pattern]. I want to talk about what’s been happening and how we might work differently moving forward. I know I’ve contributed by [own behavior]. What’s this been like from your perspective?”

Sustained repair work focuses on patterns, not incidents. It names distance before it becomes disengagement.


Designing for Repair

Each script follows the same structural logic:

  • Name what happened — precisely, without blame.
  • Acknowledge impact — even when intent was positive.
  • Commit to next steps — concrete, observable, accountable.

This pattern works because it translates emotional complexity into structure. It allows leaders to hold both truth and care in the same sentence.

The goal is not to sound polished. It’s to be specific, transparent, and believable.


When Scripts Aren’t Enough

Repair is not a single conversation. It’s a design principle.

When the same ruptures repeat across people or departments, the problem isn’t interpersonal—it’s architectural. At that point, conversations need to be supported by structure: clearer roles, decision transparency, accountability systems that match the organization’s stated values.

That’s where our work begins.

The Human Repair Workshop helps mission-driven organizations embed repair into their daily operations—so trust can break and still recover.


Real leaders don’t avoid rupture. They build systems that can survive it.

Learn more at humanrepair.org or reach us at monica@humanrepair.org.

Previous
Previous

How to Give Feedback Without Triggering Defensivness

Next
Next

A Simple Weekly Ritual That Keeps Teams Connected